Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Redhill MRT station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by JuniperChill in topic Did you know nomination

Fair use rationale for Image:NS logo.jpg

[edit]

Image:NS logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aljunied MRT Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. RMCD bot 09:30, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Redhill MRT station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Icepinner (talk · contribs) 14:33, 12 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 16:27, 13 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Shall review! Arconning (talk) 16:27, 13 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Icepinner Here'll be my comments. :) Arconning (talk) 14:08, 16 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Arconning Responded to most of your comments Icepinner (formerly Imbluey2). Please ping me so that I get notified of your response 14:45, 16 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Prose and MoS

[edit]

Lead and infobox

[edit]
  • "the station feature grilles but adopts a pink colour scheme.", I may not be understanding why it words it as "but"?
    • Zkang added that. Fixed it

History

[edit]
  • "from Tiong Bahru to Clementi stations", I may not be familiar with train terminology but shouldn't this start with "from the..."?
    • I don't think so. I forgot which MOS section it is but it doesn't sound right if you add "the" before the station name
      • Ok after discussing with some editors, there doesn't seem to be a consensus if "the" should be used before the station's name. Should I go with your suggestion?
  • Queenstown is not wikilinked here though is wikilinked later in the body, should be fixed.
    • It is if you're referring to "which detailed the construction of Redhill and Commonwealth stations". Queenstown was initially known as Commonwealth (not to be confused with the present-day Commonwealth MRT station) before it swapped names it with above station.
  • "with the MRTC awarding", wikilink for MRTC is missing.
    • Done

Details

[edit]
  • " 2-5 minutes", should be an endash.
    • Done
  • "situated between Tiong Bahru and Queenstown stations.", see second comment.
    • See my response to your comment

Media

[edit]
  • All of the images used are on proper licensing and are relevant to the article. All good.

Refs

[edit]
  • Earwig's alright
  • Reference checks: 1, 7, 8, 17, 23, 30, 39. All good.

Misc

[edit]
  • No ongoing edit war, broad enough information about the topic of the article, neutral.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by JuniperChill talk 23:56, 8 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Improved to Good Article status by Icepinner (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 6 past nominations.

Icepinner (formerly Imbluey2). Please ping me so that I get notified of your response 14:59, 18 June 2025 (UTC).Reply