Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Reaction engine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pump-jets

[edit]

Would it be correct to add water pump-jets as examples of reaction engines? The Jet-ski (and equivalent) uses a pump-jet for propulsion, i.e. it obtains thrust in reaction to the ejected stream of water. But then this is really so different from a propeller on a shaft external to the engine? (Sdsds - Talk) 18:58, 26 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

dE/dt is not F v

[edit]

In a discussion on the Talk:Conservation of energy page, I made the point that the time rate of change of the kinetic energy of the rocket engine is not simply Fv where F is the thrust and v is the engine velocity. A second term which constitutes an energy loss due to the mass of propellant being lost to the exhaust must be included. The correct statement is:

where is the rate at which propellant mass is converted to exhaust mass. As noted by 95.134.115.203, the total power P and thrust F produced by the engine can be assumed constant, so, assuming no heating effects, if Po=Fv is the rate at which the engine increases its kinetic energy, and Px is the rate of energy increase of the exhaust train, then P=Fv+Px or Px=P-Fv and at a high enough velocity, the rate of change of energy of the exhaust train is negative. Thats impossible.

I would edit the article myself, but I am not familiar enough with it to trace the implications of this throughout the article. PAR (talk) 21:53, 9 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

What is Isp ?

[edit]

It is introduced in paragraph 3 without any explanation. Nor is there any mention of Isp in the referred article "Propulsive_efficiency". Mesdale (talk) 11:03, 19 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Merge content from Spacecraft_propulsion#Reaction_engines

[edit]

The Spacecraft_propulsion article has a large (too large) section on reaction engines. I would like to see the bulk of that content moved here to this article with only a short summary left on that page. Any input like warnings or encouragement would be appreciated. Somebody doing it would also be VERY appreciated. If not, I'll give it a try, but I have a lot of propulsion studying to do before I could pull it off. Thanks. JaredHWood💬 22:47, 3 February 2021 (UTC)Reply