Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Reachability

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 months ago by Tibia mariner in topic Is reachability reflexive?

Oracles?

[edit]

In the "Algorithms" section:

"Typically algorithms for reachability that require preprocessing (and their corresponding data structures) are called oracles (similarly there are oracles for distance and approximate distance queries). "

The link to "oracles" needs to be reviewed. There are many Oracle pages in the disambiguation, but I believe that none of them match the usage invoked here. --Matt Westwood 07:00, 17 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Is reachability reflexive?

[edit]

The article seems to be unclear regarding whether the reachability relation on a directed graph is reflexive. The definition section defines the reachability relation as the transitive closure of the edge set; this would mean that no vertex in a DAG is reachable from itself, since the transitive closure of the edge set of a DAG contains no pairs .

  • If this is intentional, it would be beneficial to note in the following paragraph that the reachability relation is a strict or irreflexive partial order, and to note that this diverges from the introduction's definition of reachability on undirected graphs via connected components.
  • If it is unintentional, then the reachability relation should instead be defined as the reflexive-transitive closure, and the following paragraph should note that "if can reach , then cannot reach " applies only if .

Tibia mariner (talk) 00:44, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply