Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sustainable Development, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sustainable development and Sustainable development-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sustainable DevelopmentWikipedia:WikiProject Sustainable DevelopmentTemplate:WikiProject Sustainable DevelopmentSustainable Development
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
Latest comment: 10 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Editors who have worked on the article - are all the references needed? For instance, the third paragraph in the section "Architectural practice" has nine refs for four sentences. Can they be cut down to those which are reliable secondary sources? So, for instance, removing the three of these which are primary sources. Notable projects has 24 references - this seems excessive to verify ten projects. Tacyarg (talk) 15:51, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
The number, quality, and placement of the references needs work (e.g., the "Notable projects" and "Publications" sections both contain rather extraordinary strings of citations that could probably be trimmed and also placed adjacent to relevant text). -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 20:03, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
I appreciate the feedback on citation placement. You're right, I've felt more comfortable placing a set of citations after short paragraphs. For discursive topics, I found it easier to justify a group of sentences rather than citing each concept individually.
About projects and publications specifically, I chose to keep the citation style consistent. That was likely a bad call, according to what you pointed out. Niccolissoni (talk) 19:26, 25 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
I went a bit overboard with citations. I probably suffered from "find references" sickness, so I went for melius abundare quam deficere. I'll definitely look into cutting those down later.
One quick question: for publications specifically, is it best to use a secondary source that establishes the publication's existence and authority or to cite the publication itself with all the details (title, authors, year, publisher...)? I understand the priority on secondary sources, but in the specific case of publications, I feel the possibility to list details and codes as a good option.
