Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Rad Hourani/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 May 2019

Hello, this is a message from Rad Hourani studio, as he refuses to be called a fashion designer, and we kindly ask you to remove this title. Rad Hourani is an activist artist. He express Neutrality through different disciplines, including unisex clothes for gender equality. But he refuses to be called a Fashion designer. PLease correct, thank you. RAD HOURANI INC (talk) 15:32, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello! I left a note on your talk page about your username, which is not allowed. Regarding the request, if I look at these sources, he is very frequently called a fashion designer. Wikipedia relies on independent reporting to determine article content:
As the lede section calls him a fashion designer and artist, it sounds pretty accurate as it is.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:27, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 January 2021

please add to Career: "In 2016, Rad Hourani collaborated with VAVA Eyewear and launched a limited edition of 200 sunglasses." [1] Semyorka (talk) 22:42, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: This is a case of WP:NOTNEWS; in addition the company is not-notable. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:41, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

References

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 22 September 2021

change

to

173.178.188.15 (talk) 16:32, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:38, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

I have done many research on Rad hourani, his title is "interdisciplinary artist", he refuse to be called "fashion designer", he mentioned it in many interviews, he also explain how he use the medium of costume/ clothing to express a point on gender for unisex collections. There's also no place on his social media or web that it mentions "fashion designer", his title is always "interdisciplinary artist". It is wrong to impose a title on someone that he mention publicly that he refuse to be called by it.

https://www.radhourani.com/pages/about

https://fr.linkedin.com/in/rad-hourani-0385a71b?challengeId=AQHhTG8fq2UYtgAAAXxQ__w1F3J6MBZGNPpEMBLFNWmARX4QGQ85tNb2lb3Yzpjz1MK2DLeSloczqcZ-A88-LYf-jrJPoHcJ7w&submissionId=665377f7-f52a-ab16-fc11-288dbcdc5b31

https://twitter.com/radhourani  Preceding unsigned comment added by Art design researher (talkcontribs) 15:10, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Concerns about full protection escalation.

Hi Bearcat. I am concerned that article was upgraded from semi-protection to full-protection on the same day after only one edit. While this edit was clearly outside of Wikipedia article standards, Floquirion is a new editor, and is probably inexperienced with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I think it would be better to begin a talk page discussion to discuss content issues before escalating protection levels.

I will note I arrived here randomly, and do not have any specific edits that I was currently planning to make (I've never heard of the subject of this article before reading this article). However, I think at the very least, it should be downgraded to extended confirmed protection, as per our protection policy this is supposed to be the next level of protection after semi-protection. eπi (talk | contribs) 23:08, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Actually, extended confirmed isn't the immediate next step after autoconfirmed — it's a rarefied level of protection that can be used only if there's a long-term pattern of autoconfirmed failing to control editing problems, not a step that can be jumped to immediately. The protection wasn't indefinite, but was applied for just long enough to give the conflict of interest noticeboard time to look into the issue I raised there — but extended confirmed isn't so much "the next step after autoconfirmed" as it is "the nuclear option step, applicable only if all other options have failed". Bearcat (talk) 23:13, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
@Bearcat: The link to the COIN discussion clarifies some details. I think it might have been better if it was linked on this talk page to begin with, since it strongly pertains to this article's development. But it's understandable if this was missed, because it's not monumentally important, and it's also a matter of discretion where to post.
I disagree with your characterization of extended-confirmed protection. It is true extended-confirmed was originally created to handle a specific arbitration case, but it has evolved to broader use since then. Wikipedia:Protection policy currently reads Where semi-protection has proven to be ineffective, administrators may use extended confirmed protection to combat disruption (such as vandalism, abusive sockpuppetry, edit wars, etc.) on any topic. Reviewing the EP logs, one will see many cases of temporary protections. Even with the COIN discussion, it still seems EP may be better, but I guess it's a matter of philosophical differences.
But I can respect these differences; my earliest editing was 2015, and I definitely lack the experience to have complete confidence in my opinions regarding the handling of user behavior (though I feel POV editing requires additional careful article communication consideration in addition to the normal behavioral considerations). Ultimately, the article is only protected for five days, the protection is completely allowed by policy, and I am not personally hindered by this protection. I do not regret expressing concerns, but I will wish you well on your Wikipedia editing. eπi (talk | contribs) 01:41, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
thank you for the tip!ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:55, 7 May 2019 (UTC)


I have done many research on Rad hourani, his title is "interdisciplinary artist", he refuse to be called "fashion designer", he mentioned it in many interviews, he also explain how he use the medium of costume/ clothing to express a point on gender for unisex collections. There's also no place on his social media or web that it mentions "fashion designer", his title is always "interdisciplinary artist". It is wrong to impose a title on someone that he mention publicly that he refuse to be called by it.


https://www.radhourani.com/pages/about

https://fr.linkedin.com/in/rad-hourani-0385a71b?challengeId=AQHhTG8fq2UYtgAAAXxQ__w1F3J6MBZGNPpEMBLFNWmARX4QGQ85tNb2lb3Yzpjz1MK2DLeSloczqcZ-A88-LYf-jrJPoHcJ7w&submissionId=665377f7-f52a-ab16-fc11-288dbcdc5b31

https://twitter.com/radhourani  Preceding unsigned comment added by Art design researher (talkcontribs) 15:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 October 2021

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:05, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Art design researher (talk) 15:04, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, after doing a long research on Rad Hourani, here's what I suggest as his wikipedia page as the current page is misleading :

 Preceding unsigned comment added by Art design researher (talkcontribs) 19:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)