Talk:Rachel Hardeman
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rachel Hardeman article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article needs to be updated
[edit]Washington Post, January 9, 2021: "Mortality rate for Black babies is cut dramatically when they’re delivered by Black doctors, researchers say"
Daily Caller, March 31, 2025: "A September 2024 replication effort concluded that the original study authors did not statistically control for very low birth weight newborns at the highest risk of dying. Applying that control zeroed out any statistically significant effect of racial concordance on infant mortality."
R5Y93mdf (talk) 23:59, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- The Daily Caller is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYCALLER. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 14:49, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- Can just link to the study.
- https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2409264121 2600:1702:7530:510F:AD5D:7C60:A251:8B30 (talk) 06:49, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Plagiarism
[edit]The article currently states: "Hardeman had been publicly accused of plagiarism by a former colleague, but called the allegations "completely false" and said it was a mistake of not appropriately attributing her colleague's work"
I will point out that "not appropriately attributing [a] colleague's work" IS the DEFINITION of plagiarism. One recent editor seems to keep reverting the text of this article to make it seem like the violation is minor. It is not. The U of MN has since been accused of mishandling their investigation into the plagiarism and failed to report the allegations to the federal agency providing funding. "Federal regulations require the university to tell the NIH if there's even suspected plagiarism involving one of the government’s grant-funded projects." https://web.archive.org/web/20250514010154/https://www.mprnews.org/story/2025/04/28/university-minnesota-rachel-hardeman-plagiarism-allegations; https://web.archive.org/web/20250515000000*/https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2025/04/16/the-frustrating-case-of-rachel-hardeman/ 73.228.199.124 (talk) 14:05, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hello. If I am the "recent editor" you speak of, I removed poorly sourced material cited only to a firsthand accusation posted to LinkedIn, which falls well below the stringent requirements of WP:BLP. I have no opinions about the seriousness of the plagiarism allegations described here, and in fact know very little about the incident or individuals involved — I was merely ensuring that this article follows Wikipedia requirements for sourcing for biographies of living people. You are welcome to wordsmith or add further information based on high quality reliable sources, if it is available. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 14:44, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. I'll add more sources here to help a decision be made via consensus.
- https://web.archive.org/web/20250417102209/https://www.startribune.com/university-of-minnesotas-rachel-hardeman-steps-down-as-plagiarism-accusations-are-made-public/601331138 73.228.199.124 (talk) 14:47, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- I would recommend also providing some draft text for discussion, in addition to the sources you plan to incorporate to support the text. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 14:48, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- Someone has made changes since me and included details which may not meet the stringent requirements of WP:BLP. 73.228.199.124 (talk) 21:04, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- I would recommend also providing some draft text for discussion, in addition to the sources you plan to incorporate to support the text. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 14:48, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Irrelevant info in article
[edit]This sentence seems irrelevant: "Her mother, Sharri Belton Hardeman, served as a juror in the Trial of Derek Chauvin for the murder of George Floyd." The sentence before that ("Her uncle's wife, Sharon Sayles Belton, was the first Black and first female mayor of the city.") is marginal in terms of relevance for Hardeman's accomplishments.
Also wondering whether her limited scholarly accomplishments make her worthy of a Wikipedia page, especially in light of the effect of the plagiarism allegations. I guess time will tell how that affects her career. Many other researchers, including POC, with greater scholarly achievements, haven't been granted Wikipedia pages. 73.228.199.124 (talk) 18:33, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class African diaspora articles
- Unknown-importance African diaspora articles
- WikiProject African diaspora articles
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Minnesota articles
- Low-importance Minnesota articles
- C-Class WikiProject Women articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women articles
- C-Class women's health articles
- Unknown-importance women's health articles
- WikiProject Women's Health articles
