Talk:RIM-101

Possibly?

I wasn't sure about the term "possibly" in the Lead section, until I read further down. But then "Some sources" cites two works by the same author. Perhaps another source, or leading the sentence with "It is speculated..."? Also, a short paragraph, even a sentence or two, comparing the two projects could justify to the reader why the RIM-101 might have been a derivative project of RIM-7. Clear these up, and I'll come back with a "B"! Good luck! Boneyard90 (talk) 03:13, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

I've changed "some sources" to "it has been...", and added a bit about the timing of RIM-101 vs the RIM-7 variants. Hope that helps! :) - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:19, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

And B-class it shall be! Boneyard90 (talk) 04:26, 31 January 2011 (UTC)