Talk:Quranism
Add topic | Quranism is currently a Philosophy and religion good article nominee. Nominated by Skelatorr (talk) at 10:05, 3 August 2026 (UTC) This article is ready to be reviewed in accordance with the good article criteria. Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review the article and decide if it should be listed as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and then save the page. See the instructions. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Quranism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When editing this article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve it, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Duplicate citations?
[edit source]Hi! I noticed quite a few duplicate/copied citations. For instance, the text Christmann, Andreas (2009). The Qurʾan, Morality and Critical Reason: The Essential Muhammad Shahrur
appears six times without any apparent deviation, like a page number or a quote. Could someone either merge these ref calls or add something distinguishing? Thanks! - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 15:21, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Skelatorr Also, there are way too many links. For instance, the term Hadith does not need to be linked every single time. I'm going to be bold and remove what I have to - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 12:40, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- ah okay thank you
- i thought every term must be linked, because the reader will only read the sections he wants..
- thank you for the feedback Skelatorr (talk) 13:42, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- You're welcome! If you're curious, I'm referring to MOS:OVERLINK :) - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 13:48, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- many thanks... I focused on this article in hopes of getting a Good Article badge as my first achievement. I'm hoping many editors like you can help Skelatorr (talk) 14:34, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- You're welcome! If you're curious, I'm referring to MOS:OVERLINK :) - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 13:48, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Citations and sources
[edit source]@Skelatorr: can you please read WP:REFSECTION and implement it in this article? You can have one section for Citation notes, and then a works cited. It would be helpful if you divided the works cited by journals and books in one section, and internet articles in another. You can ask at WP:TEAHOUSE if you want help. Right now, the citations are pretty hard to find
Also, you sometimes cite a book but do not give the page number. Per WP:Verifiability, this is not really acceptable, and you should cite specific page(s) instead. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 15:54, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees awaiting review
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- B-Class Islam-related articles
- Mid-importance Islam-related articles
- B-Class Religious texts articles
- Unknown-importance Religious texts articles
- WikiProject Religious texts articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- B-Class Religion articles
- Low-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles