Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
In wikipedia, a "criticism" section should be a NPOV summary of how a work or concept is received by expert commentators in the field, per definition 2 of the Cambridge dictionary "the act of giving your opinion or judgment about the good or bad qualities of something or someone, especially books, films, etc.".
The "criticism" section of this article is instead definition 1: "the act of saying that something or someone is bad".
This section is biased, under-referenced and reads like an opinion piece rather than an encyclopedic article. This section needs to be rewritten to give cited, attributed opinions as to why "quotaism" is a good thing or a bad thing. With so many examples of quotaism in action given, someone somewhere must have a good word to say about this.
Wikipedia will be better without this section as it currently is, if improvewments to not occur I suggest it is simply removed.
