Talk:Quantum authentication
Add topic| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reviewer 1: nice work!
[edit]Very far from knowing the field. At the writing level the article seems solid and seems to comply with all the guidelines and best practices. I have added some wikilinks, plus:
- I have added the no-cloning theorem wikilink its FIRST occurrence in the article, even though it was linked on its second occurrence. Still, if you have a reason to only keep the wikilink on the second occurrence, you are free to revert it.
- "quantum secure direct communication" (specific) links to "quantum cryptography" (much broader). Probably worth removing the link.
I have not further comments as I wouldn't be able to contribute to the content. Nice job :) Cerlonghish (talk) 13:13, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
- Great notes! I have removed the link from the second occurrence, only leaving the one you added.
- I have also removed the QSDC link.
- Thank you for the thorough read and helpful feedback! Livgiac (talk) 13:46, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer 2: I agree with reviewer 1!
[edit]Good job, very interesting article. I made some changes:
- Fixed references. A reference should come after a full stop, not before.
- Fixed the mathematical equation to .
Overall, great job. Congrats! :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by CommunalToothbrush (talk • contribs)
Reviewer 3
[edit]Very interesting article and well written. I did only minor changes on wiki-links addition and punctuation.
I suggest revising the first section, which is the most important because introduces the topic, since some sentences seem to be not much clear. In particular:
"It is a separate problem from the authentication assumed in QKD protocols, which is needed on the classical channel and therefore doesn't natively require quantum resources."
"navigating existing technical constraints, mostly those of the quantum technologies needed which are still under development."
Nothing else to say, thank you! Bengo14 (talk) 14:26, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks, I edited the sentences hoping they make more sense to an outside reader! Livgiac (talk) 14:34, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
