Talk:Quanta Computer

Quanta computers are fast and take time get a virus

Number of employees

As an employee of QCG (Quanta Computer Germany) I know that the figure of 30000 is much too small. QSMC (Quanta Shanghai) alone has more than 45000 employees. Alas, I do not know any numbers about QCI (Quanta Taiwan, huge) or QCA (Quanta USA, two sites, don't know size). QCG's 200-500 employees (many temporary workers, depending on projects) are negligible for world-wide figures.

Official name

The official name should be "Quanta Computer" not "Quanta Computers".--72.52.66.11 15:27, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Didn't Quanta have the 'iphone' as an off the shelf design before apple bought it? I would have thought this would be of interest to most people who were under the impression it was an apple design. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.0.214.59 (talk) 14:03, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Teehee, wouldn't surprise me, the thing about Apple, irony is the one's who complain about 'cheap chinese s**t' are the one's holding Iphone's made by Foxconn in Shenzhen —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.91.167.135 (talk) 09:27, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

wtf, stub

Why is this article a stub, they had 24 billion dollar revenue and are listed as the second largest technology company in the world by market capitalization. I would do so myself but i lack the expertise to find suitable sources in this area and I havent edited wikipedia myself before. This is clearly a notable company worthy of at least more detailed financial information. 114.76.63.231 (talk) 12:46, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Backroom Editing...?

Anybody notice how this article REALLY plays up the image of Quanta, saying that " With leading technology and strong R&D, Quanta has become a leader in hi-tech markets"... and so on. Perhaps somebody from within Quanta edited this article, because all of those claims are not cited...

--66.227.233.171 (talk) 06:20, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Tone, Claims

I made some edits here that hopefully dialed down some un-cited claims. There was a long list of supposed contracts they had with notable companies with a citation for none of them. If they get added back, I think they need to be cited. All of them. I don’t doubt the claim as much as I feel like it being un-cited contributes to misunderstanding. Similarly, I renamed “Products” to “Manufactured products” because— they are not their products. This is a manufacturer, but the products are not theirs. Louie Mantia (talk) 10:55, 28 May 2025 (UTC)