Talk:Qalyoub train collision
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 14 years ago by 41.233.79.142 in topic Questions
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Questions
[edit]- Darth Vader? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.233.79.142 (talk) 21:51, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
- one driver or two?
- locomotive hauled trains often have two drivers (or driver and observer)
- multiple unit trains generally have one driver only.
- Track circuits or not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tabletop (talk • contribs) 00:32, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- type of signal? Semaphore or colour light?
- Any Outer Home signals?
- any ATC or AWS, etc?
- double or single line.
- junction?
- fog?
- are signals controlled by track circuits?
- diesel or electric traction.
- couplings - strong or weak?
- carriages - strong (steel) or weak (wooden)?
- signal failure?
- brake failure?
- Signal passed at danger?
- burst into flames?
Tabletop 01:00, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Answers
[edit]- aerial photo shows two tracks, which might not be two mainline tracks of a double track line.
- aerial photo shows no overhead wires, so train probably diesel powered, which is consistant with reported fire (from diesel fuel?)
- train reported to have concertinaed (aka telescoped). Telescoping less likely with strong couplings.
- reports of "light" signals would increase likelyhood of track circuits, a device particular good at reducing likely of collisions.
- burst into flames imples diesel trains with flammable diesel fuel.
Acccident Report
[edit]Observations
[edit]- ATC - mentioned in report
- "A console that identifies trains and their locations to control tower staff was also not functional."[1] seems to say that track circuits and/or a signal box indicator diagram weren't working.