Talk:Qaidam Basin
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Qaidam Basin article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Location map
[edit]
Here is a sample location map which could go in the article if space allows. --Teratornis (talk) 20:35, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- It's the internet. There's always space. — LlywelynII 00:45, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Google's preview
[edit]is blocking access to 1102 & 1103 but the earlier pages possible indicate that the lake spread much further than only 300 km across. — LlywelynII 00:45, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Sources for future article expansion
[edit]This link
was placed in the External Links as "People's Daily on Qaidam". It isn't a general external resource helpful to readers; it's just a story about sth that should either be discussed and cited in the article or (if it's outside of the article's wp:scope or wp:unduely focused) doesn't need mentioning at all. — LlywelynII 01:03, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
WP:Lakes
[edit]Is it appropriate to include this article in Wikiproject lakes? Thoughts? Uninspired Username (talk) 22:48, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- C-Class China-related articles
- Low-importance China-related articles
- C-Class China-related articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- WikiProject Deserts articles
- C-Class Geology articles
- Low-importance Geology articles
- Low-importance C-Class Geology articles
- WikiProject Geology articles
- C-Class Lakes articles
- Low-importance Lakes articles
- WikiProject Lakes articles