Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Pyroelectric fusion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 19 years ago by 74.167.234.252 in topic Farnsworth Fusor

Pyroelectric fusion

[edit]

Good article - but are you sure that the following sentence is correct: "the process does not appear to be able to generate net power" ?

The Economist article on this experiment (http://www.economist.com/science/displayStory.cfm?story_id=3909490) states that the team were unwilling to speculate whether their apparatus could produce net energy if it were scaled up.--New Thought 12:43, 6 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Don't bother. I worked the calculations for research, and it's impossible. Only a small fraction of the energy input into the crystal to heat it up goes into charge (much less than 1%), and fusion yields being what they are, it's not going to produce more than a tiny fraction of the input. 74.167.234.252 22:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Farnsworth Fusor

[edit]

Anyone know how this differs from a Farnsworth Fusor?  Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.22.154.164 (talkcontribs)

Deuterium is accelerated from a charged tip into a solid object? - Omegatron July 1, 2005 00:34 (UTC)
yes, deuterium ions (deuterons) are accelerated into a deuterium-containing target, where the Where most conventional fusion research revolves around confining a ball of high-energy plasma in which fusion can occur, this is much more similar to a particle accerator. 74.167.234.252 22:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
I do (I'm working in the field now). A Farnsworth fusor uses an electrical high-voltage source and a wire mesh to accelerate and trap ions; this setup uses crystals to generate the high electrical potential, and produces a beam (as with a particle accelerator) rather than a fusing plasma. 74.167.234.252 22:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply