Talk:Pyreneanism
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Chiswick Chap in topic GA review
| Pyreneanism has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 13, 2026. (Reviewed version). |
| This article was edited to contain a total or partial translation of Pyrénéisme from the French Wikipedia. Consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors. |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Pyreneanism/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Bobby Cohn (talk · contribs) 21:22, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 18:42, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]What an extraordinary and fascinating subject, well presented.
- I've fixed a few minor errors of typography and formatting.
- Merci.
- The language is in places somewhat Gallic in style, i.e. perhaps bordering on the flowery rather than the encyclopedic, but not unreasonably so. A little copy-editing would not go amiss.
- I'd drop the "Notable" from the list of 'Pyreneist and Pyrenean mountaineers'; we never list non-notables (and it chimes oddly with the mass of redlinks).
- I agree, thoughts on the use of "Select"?
- Could be ok, if you need to use any word there: or just do without.
- I agree, thoughts on the use of "Select"?
- Please avoid the use of the word "today" as it's a moveable feast. E.g. in 'Contemporary perception'.
- Revised, reworded one, dropped one.
- "defines Pyreneism by positioning it in opposition to" -> "defines it in opposition to"
- "intense and original publishing activity" -> "publishing activity"
- Done, above link.
- "an unquestionable prerequisite" -> "a prerequisite"
- Done, above link.
- "Himalayanism and Andinism" - one a redlink, the other a redirect to Mountaineering which however does not even mention the term. Suggest we remove both links; ideally get the redirect deleted as well (ex GAN).
- "the chain has constituted 'a major space of transport and mobility'" - well, that's the passes, not the chain of summits (as the first sentence of 'History' makes clear); and the quote's wording is excessively Gallic for Wikipedia, suggest we just say "the range's passes have been important for transport" which is all that is meant here.
- Please gloss Carbonnières, de Chausenque, and Russell at first mentions in main text.
- I'll be honest, I didn't 100% know what you mean by gloss, I assumed you meant "give context" (glossary?), so I added what made them notable based on their respective Wiki leads, or biographies if it was solely about the Pyrenees. Please let me know if I missed the mark here.
- Yes, a gloss is just a few words introducing someone or something for those who don't know.
- I'll be honest, I didn't 100% know what you mean by gloss, I assumed you meant "give context" (glossary?), so I added what made them notable based on their respective Wiki leads, or biographies if it was solely about the Pyrenees. Please let me know if I missed the mark here.
- Replace redlink "Pique Longue" with Pic Long. Obsolete spelling.
Images
[edit]- All images are on Commons, either PD or plausibly CC-by-SA. They are all suitable for the article.
Sources
[edit]Sources are all suitable for Wikipedia.
- [24] date should be 1898 in ref
- [52..56] date (2024) is missing in refs
- Done, in above edit.
- Some French titles are missing translations, e.g. [6], [11].
- Done see reference 11, additional references, I think ref 6 has one already.
- I don't have Bordes to hand so AGF there.
Spot-checks:
- [2] ok
- [6] ok
- [14] ok
- [57] ok
- [68] ok
Summary
[edit]The article is in an excellent state, and I've made no more than the most minor of comments, so I expect to see this at GA very shortly.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Sports and recreation good articles
- Pages translated from French Wikipedia
- GA-Class Mountain articles
- Low-importance Mountain articles
- All WikiProject Mountains pages
- GA-Class France articles
- Low-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages
- GA-Class Spain articles
- Low-importance Spain articles
- All WikiProject Spain pages
- GA-Class Climbing articles
- Low-importance Climbing articles
- WikiProject Climbing articles
- GA-Class Literature articles
- Low-importance Literature articles
- GA-Class Visual arts articles
- WikiProject Visual arts articles
- GA-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- GA-Class European history articles
- Low-importance European history articles
- All WikiProject European history pages