Talk:Pyŏngjin
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Finnusertop in topic Title
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Title
[edit]@Sawol: I think Byungjin is much more common in reliable sources. 239,000 versus 7,590 hits on Google. I don't think it really matters what KCNA prefers. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 11:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- This terminology is from North Korea. North Korea made and is conducting Pyongjin line. I think we should respect their preferences McCune–Reischauer. I don’t care whether you revert. Sawol (talk) 11:58, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- The policy is use MR for North Korea, unless the majority of English-language sources use something else (MOS:KO#Romanization). – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 12:31, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Korea-related articles
- Low-importance Korea-related articles
- Korean military history task force articles
- WikiProject Korea North Korea working group
- WikiProject Korea articles
- Stub-Class military history articles
- Stub-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- Stub-Class Korean military history articles
- Stub-Class Economics articles
- Low-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- Stub-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles


