Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Pseudoconvexity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Vaughan Pratt in topic Redirection of Hartogs' domain

Are all convex sets in C^n pseudoconvex?

[edit]

A discussion would be useful.Rich 20:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yes, they are. At least if you by convex mean ordinary linear convexity. This is a elementary result which can be found in, Holomorphic functions and integral representations in several complex variables, ISBN 0-387-96259-x, by R. Michael Range Vigfus (talk) 11:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Redirection of Hartogs' domain

[edit]

The redirection here of the link Hartogs' domain is somewhat misleading, since those domains are extremely particular pseudoconvex domains, having properties not shared by other kind of set belonging to such class. It is necessary to create separated entry: anyone interested? :D Daniele.tampieri (talk) 14:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

At the very least, there should be a reference somewhere in Wikipedia to Hartogs' involvement, such as a citation to relevant work of Hartogs, or to a book or paper treating Hartogs' domain. As it is, I have no idea where to research this. Vaughan Pratt (talk) 04:11, 23 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

defining functions

[edit]

Is it true that the defining function of a Levy pseudoconvex domain can be extended to all of C^n? Shouldn't it rather be a neighborhood of the closure of the Levy pseudoconvex domain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.49.88.228 (talk) 21:07, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Reply