Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Przytyk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pogrom in Przytyk (1936), song about the burning shtetl (1938)

[edit]

Yidish song by Mordekhai Gebirtig: S'brent! briderlekh, s'brent! Oy, undzer orem shtetl nebekh brent! 79.251.122.52 (talk) 03:50, 20 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nonsense

[edit]

The recent entry (May 18) ->

  • On 9 March 1936 in the Przytyk pogrom the National Democracy party organized a boycott of Jewish trade enforced by violence against Jewish stalls. The Jews organized a self-defense organization and fought back, killing one Polish assailant and wounded several others

So because of the boycott of Jewish trade Jews organized a self-defense and killed Poles?... I recommend pausing for 5 seconds and reason before reverting back to this drivel.GizzyCatBella (talk) 18:23, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sourcing to English language two Oxford University Press book, by mainline authors, is far superior to material sourced to a political blog, in Polish, of a far right activist/historian. The boycott was enforced by violence - Poles forcefully closed Jewish businesses, and in response to this violence Jewish self defense was organized - per any serious RS covering these events.Icewhiz (talk) 04:36, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Jews did’t kill in response to the boycott or violence, please read the source.GizzyCatBella (talk) 06:37, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Per mainline source, Jews were defending themselves from a Polish mob that was trying to strongarm their businesses in the market.Icewhiz (talk) 06:41, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Polish mob did’t have firearms please read the source.GizzyCatBella (talk) 06:43, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
I am not sure if your assertion is correct, but even if so - so what? I suggest you stick representing mainline academic texts here, and not discredited far right political blogs or texts that most of the academic community rejects.Icewhiz (talk) 06:47, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
But you keep removing an academic text that the information has been referenced to.GizzyCatBella (talk) 06:51, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
No. I am removing a political blog on salon24, by a far right activist/historian. And a popular book (not an academic one) by a similar author that has been throughly discredited - Tygiel Kultury, 2002 nr 1/3, pp. 180-184, Gazeta Wyborcza, 2001-03-07, nr 74, p 1, Przegląd Historyczny, 2001, nr 2, pp. 259-261. And instead of these unreliable and highly POVish sources - reflecting what is written in books by Oxford University Press.Icewhiz (talk) 06:59, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Opposite, it is supported by two highly respected scholars Chodakiewicz and Gontarczyk - (expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the subject matter, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications) You referenced your information to journalist Michnik.GizzyCatBella (talk) 07:09, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Chodakiewicz is a far right activist and has been covered by the SPLC a couple of times. His political blog is not an acceptable source. Gontarczyk's book has been thoroughly discredited.Icewhiz (talk) 18:31, 20 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

“Zajścia polsko-żydowskie w Przytyku 9 marca 1936 r” book by Gontarczyk

[edit]

Why was this removed ? This information is from "Zajścia polsko-żydowskie w Przytyku 9 marca 1936 r" book by GontarczykGizzyCatBella (talk) 07:17, 19 May 2018 (UTC) Oficyna Wydawnicza isbn=9788386379620 by GontarczykGizzyCatBella (talk) 07:24, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Not academically published. Dismissed by as unscientific, unobjective, ignoring and dismissing previous writing as propaganda, rationalized form of the entho-nationalist approach, justifying anti-Jewish violence as a form of national defense as the Jews are not part of the Polish nation but rather an "alien and harmful nation".[1][2] [3][4] Icewhiz (talk) 18:42, 20 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

References

And besides the above - per WP:NOENG, we prefer sources in English when they are of a higher of equal quality.Icewhiz (talk) 18:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Recent edit

[edit]

Please see diff. My rationale was: "go with the minimalist version as per my suggestion at NPOVN; once the dispute is settled at Przytyk pogrom, could be expanded here". Please let me know of any concerns. --K.e.coffman (talk) 16:01, 20 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, thats good.GizzyCatBella (talk) 16:03, 20 May 2018 (UTC)Reply