Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Prunus cerasoides

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 days ago by Faizan Asghar58 in topic Native Range

Request for refs

[edit]

I added the tag on citations because it is my opinion that statements indicating the plant improves digestion and stimulates respiration should cite specific sources for people who wish to use the plant for that purpose.

The tag adder did not sign, but I think he was justified. Also the article lacks all the usual refs to the GRIN and other databases.Dave 20:25, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
As to whether we should write an article the reader can use for medical purposes, DEFINITELY NOT!!!! In fact there should be a disclaimer in there if we are going the medical route. You can say, this was an ancient remedy, or this was a folk medicine, but leave it up to the professional medical people, doctors and druggists, to prescribe. We are not quacks. If I see anyone trying to be one I sure will bring it up to the top level administrators here fast. We don't use encyclopedias to treat ourselves or encourage others to do so. The sick and unhealthy are entitled to medical care in this country, not Wikipedia quackery.Dave 20:25, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

On cleanup ...

[edit]

Whoever cleans it up adding the refs (it might be me, maybe not) should be aware that GRIN now portrays this as a variety. GRIN says:

"Prunus cerasoides var. campanulata (1 accessions)
Prunus cerasoides var. cerasoides (1 accessions)"

We also have Prunus campanulata (on which I am working). Since we already have these as species not varieties I made an impromptu decision not to move them but to give the correct GRIN specification in the article. You can see what I did when I dump campanulata into Wikipedia (not quite yet). You botanical savants, feel free to change it. It was a tough decision and maybe the plant committee should be making it. I figured the traditionalists might like to see it under its old name and be informed there of the change.Dave 20:25, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

[edit]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 18:54, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Native Range

[edit]

Scholarship sources do not support native range extending to Malayasia or Island Southeast Asia. It's diversity is centered in SW China, central Himalayas & mainland Southeast Asian highlands. It is also not native to Pakistan, where other Prunus species dominate. See sources including Tiansawat (2022). ~2026-24397-20 (talk) 19:00, 21 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

There are many others that suppourt it though, for example Mehboob-ur-Rahman (2012) Wild plants of Swat with the source of POWO being highly reliable. Faizan Asghar58 (talk) 04:10, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply