Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetictree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Protista, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of protists and protistology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ProtistaWikipedia:WikiProject ProtistaTemplate:WikiProject ProtistaProtista
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The lion analogy in the opening paragraph seemed odd and awkward, but is drawn from the conclusions section of Tikhonenkov, et al 2022: "Despite their diversity and global distribution, Provora are numerically rare, but as eukaryovorous predators, their rarity relative to other microbes is not surprising and does not indicate a lack of ecological impact any more than a lion’s rarity compared to wildebeest does." I was tempted to remove it as odd, so would't want anyone else to make a similar mistake. Rorybowman (talk) 07:18, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}