Talk:Prosiopesis

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Age of the term

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article tells us:

David Crystal writes, "In rhetorical terminology, an elision in word-initial position was known as aphaeresis or prosiopesis, in word-medial position was known as syncope, and in word-final position as apocope."

And yes, Crystal does indeed write this (minus the hyperlinks).

"Was known", past tense: but Crystal doesn't say when. I'd take it to mean some time well before 1917, which is when Jespersen presented it as his own coining. Lanham's Handlist has a proper entry for aposiopesis but no mention of prosiopesis, I'd guess because it is such a recent term. If this guess is right, then Crystal's description is rather misleading. -- Hoary (talk) 22:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Age of the term