Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Primitive Technology

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by DanielRigal in topic Does a youtuber warrant a Wikipedia page?

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 14 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Huw82.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

The channel has a new logo on it, as can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAL3JXZSzSm8AlZyD3nQdBA Perhaps it's time to change the logo on the article to reflect this change? Jurryaany (talk) 16:46, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Jurryaany: You can upload a new version of File:Primitive Technology logo.png, or a new file, if you wish. Hrodvarsson (talk) 00:38, 27 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Hrodvarsson: Alright I'll do that then. I assume the same copyright status would apply? Jurryaany (talk) 13:37, 27 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Jurryaany: I am not an expert on copyright but I think so, unless otherwise stated by the creator. I have edited the non-free use rationale to be logo specific, which I imagine the original uploader intended but may have been unaware that such a template existed. Hrodvarsson (talk) 20:32, 27 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Trivialist: Can you explain why you reverted the edits to the file? You did not leave an edit summary. Hrodvarsson (talk) 23:41, 28 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about that. I reverted it because it seemed like it should be uploaded as a new file, not overwriting an existing file. Trivialist (talk) 00:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Trivialist: I do not think there would be a benefit in having both the wordpress.com logo and the new logo in the article so the previous image would be deleted as non-free. Do you mind if I revert your reversion? The new logo appears to be the subject's current branding. Hrodvarsson (talk) 00:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
That's fine; since they're both non-free images the old version would have been deleted anyway. Trivialist (talk) 01:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
Okay, thanks. I have done so. Hrodvarsson (talk) 01:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Does a youtuber warrant a Wikipedia page?

[edit]

Is he famous? Not a celebrity, not a historical figure. I don't understand why this YouTube channel has a page. 73.109.165.7 (talk) 03:06, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

The subject meets our Notability requirements as it has received significant coverage by Reliable Sources. --DanielRigal (talk) 03:16, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply