Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Prime zeta function

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2A04:CEC0:F07D:B8AB:440E:4E1:90:AE74 in topic Property not clear

Just wondering where the last formula comes from (after "If we define a sequence"), what Lemma 2.7 is meant to be (which makes it appear this was all copied from somewhere) and if it is correct where it converges and if it converges any quicker than the u(n) series! PS Is there any interest in the zeros of this function, a few years back I calculated many hundreds of them which the Mathworld site used in their graphs without attribution. Andrew W 202.7.182.10 (talk) 06:16, 16 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

There is a typo indicated by imbalanced parentheses in the Properties section. "with an infinite number of logarithmic singularities at points s where ns is a pole (only ns = 1))" Unfortunately I have no idea what any of this means so I don't know how to fix it. 99.45.117.132 (talk) 09:22, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Any reason why the P(s) table has values for n=2,3,4,5, and then 9?

[edit]

In particular, skipping over n=6,7,8. 2600:1700:38D0:2870:7426:834D:1CE7:9E8D (talk) 02:25, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Property not clear

[edit]

"where ns is a pole (only ns = 1 when n is a squarefree number greater than or equal to 1) ..." Riemann zeta function only has a pole at 1, so there are no other possibilities then ns = 1, regardless of n being squarefree or not. 2A04:CEC0:F07D:B8AB:440E:4E1:90:AE74 (talk) 18:22, 18 November 2024 (UTC)Reply