Talk:Precariat
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Avatar317 in topic See also
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Some Marxists only
[edit]Some Marxists only, because the precarious employee working two retail jobs isn't part of any "reserve army of labour." Kjk2.1 (talk) 18:43, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Is it still neologism?
[edit]The term is found 34 000 times in google scholar. I do not think that the word neologism is good in the defintion. Reprarina (talk) 00:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
See also
[edit]The use of the see also section here is absurd. I don't see a need for it. Viriditas (talk) 23:09, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
- I agree with you, it seems to be a dumping ground for anyone's pet political cause, no matter how non-related to this subject. "Discrimination against autistic people" !?!?! I support blanking that section; thanks for bringing this up. ---Avatar317(talk) 23:30, 18 July 2025 (UTC)