Talk:Praise of Mahakala

[Untitled]

An additional transliteration into Cyrillic Mongolian is okay, but the text should basically be given in non-conventionalized transcription from Middle Mongolian. That is, you may not even follow Damdinsuren when doing so but have to rely on the facsimiles. Else, I'm not sure whether this article establishes its relevance for Wikipedia (though I'd say that it is relevant), and I may point to the infavourable ratio between explaining text and source text. Anyway, thank you for this new article! G Purevdorj (talk) 07:28, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Whch script was it written in?

Was the original written in Mongolian script, Phagspa script, or yet some other script? I assume the supposedly original text in this wp article is just the text as given by Damdinsuren, so it might be not completely the same as the text of the "original" original. Unfortunately the link to the picture of the original doesn't work. Yaan (talk) 10:10, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Guess this is the original, so problem solved. Yaan (talk) 10:15, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

And actually the answer is already in the first sentence of the article. O dear. Yaan (talk) 10:17, 6 October 2009 (UTC)