Talk:Pozole
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pozole article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives (index): 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disambiguation?
[edit]'Pozole' is also the process of dissolving bodies in lye made famous by 'El Pozolero del Teo'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Evildave (talk • contribs) 05:48, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Last sentence on first page - http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/09/us/09border.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.41.73.130 (talk) 17:59, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Shockingly level of generalization
[edit]This:
"The conjunction of maize (usually whole hominy kernels) and meat in a single dish is of particular interest to scholars, because the ancient Americans(which?) believed the gods made humans out of masa (cornmeal dough)."
...is a highly contentious statement.
I'm pretty sure the Inuit as well the Pacific Northwest tribes had no such legend since it's unlikely, especially the former, were ever raising tons of corn.
And given the disparate lifestyles, cultures and languages that developed even within the Mesoamerican/corn sphere (so to speak) such generalization is, well, silly.
Needs to be sourced at the very least.
Unreliable sources... "of a commercial nature"
[edit]One type of unreliable source not allowed on Wikipedia is sources "of a commercial nature". Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and everything has to be backed up by reliable sources. No, Wikipedia is not a food blog and you can't advertise your business via Wikipedia. If what you write is true, you should be able to cite reliable sources. If you can't, your content may be challenged with a [citation needed] template and if no reliable source is added the content may be removed. Notice that I left one source there because it wasn't blatantly commercial. If UNAM really studied posole and cannibalism, it should be published in a reputable scientific journal. If not it can be removed. Senor Cuete (talk) 16:01, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Reference 11 is not a valid reference link any more
[edit]Talking about: [11] Pozolli. (n.d.). Nahuatl dictionary. Retrieved 28 August 2012, from http://whp.uoregon.edu/dictionaries/nahuatl/index.lasso
As I tried today, the link only returns a 404 error from the uoregon server. I can done the Nahuatl dictionary under a new address but the Pozolli entry does not support the given context in the article: https://nahuatl.wired-humanities.org/content/pozolli
Should it be removed or updated? VulpeX2Triumph (talk) 15:27, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
- I tried finding an archived version of the page via the Internet Archive but didn't succeed. Considering this, it seems best to either find a new reliable source that sufficiently supports the content as written or else to update our text to reflect what the current version of the Nahuatl dictionary actually says. Gawaon (talk) 15:44, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
- Start-Class Food and drink articles
- Mid-importance Food and drink articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- Start-Class Mexico articles
- Mid-importance Mexico articles
- WikiProject Mexico articles
- Start-Class Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles
- Unknown-importance Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles
- Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class New Mexico articles
- Mid-importance New Mexico articles
- WikiProject New Mexico articles
- WikiProject United States articles
