Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Popchips

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Wikipedian192 in topic Competitors?

This article should be deleted.

[edit]

1. Popchips is not a well known enough brand to deserve its own article on Wikipedia.

2. This reads like an advertisement for the brand instead of encylopedic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.20.110.31 (talk) 23:58, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

No reason to delete the article. Your first point, I'd say their recognition from Forbes argues against you as well as the fact that I can buy them at any major retailer in my state. I'm not prepared to argue your second point, but that point argues for a rewrite, not deletion. --71.205.234.192 (talk) 02:24, 9 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

This is still a crappy article, but I found some more production info to reference. The proprietary "process" is a bit annoying to narrow down, since it seems more that the company simply does not want to reveal a standard process that has been applied to potato flour instead of rice flour. Still does read excessively as an advertisement, but tagged as such where appropriate.  2001:db8:: (rfc | diff) 05:27, 17 March 2013 (UTC)Reply


3. Good as a general outline, more information needs to be added. I found a few minor spelling mistakes. The page layout and organization is good. The footnotes and citations are good. Overall I would rate this 7/10, just because not all the information from your other group members is in this article yet.Cylersarah31 (talk) 16:31, 15 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Competitors?

[edit]

Quaker Oats is making some very similar chips from rice, named "Popped" (formerly "Quakers Rice Snacks"). Should these be mentioned? Wikipedian192 (talk) 06:41, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply