Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Auckland, which aims to improve the coverage of Auckland, New Zealand, on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.AucklandWikipedia:WikiProject AucklandTemplate:WikiProject AucklandWikiProject Auckland
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands
Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments2 people in discussion
@Nurg what is the source for 'The Department of Conservation has no plans to take Ponui kiwi to supplement existing populations elsewhere, because of their mixed genetic origins, according to a 2006 report', the NZ Herald story does not mention 2006 nor any mixed origins for the birds, unless I've overlooked that somehow. Traumnovelle (talk) 22:49, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
It's the Latham source. I have now added another instance of the cite, for that statement – and added page nos as a bonus. Nurg (talk) 23:32, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
I initially looked because the claim 'mixed genetic origins' confused me as they are the same species. I am currently getting a 504 error trying to load the thesis currently but are you able to find the actual DOC report? Traumnovelle (talk) 23:36, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
The mixed genetics must refer to geographically separate populations of the same species. Latham does not cite a source for DOC's non-plan. Nurg (talk) 00:48, 2 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Seems odd for that to be a concern to me given it'd result in a larger gene pool but I don't know enough to know where else to look/what the merits of the claim are. Traumnovelle (talk) 00:56, 2 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
