Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Protista, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of protists and protistology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ProtistaWikipedia:WikiProject ProtistaTemplate:WikiProject ProtistaProtista
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi
Podiata is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal
Latest comment: 22 days ago4 comments2 people in discussion
@Snoteleks, does the article cited in the paragraph that begins with "All studied groups of Podiata have a shared capability to produce pseudopodia" support that claim? I wasn't able to find such thing in the article, I only found for apusomonads. Jako96 (talk) 10:06, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I found it now, but it still doesn't say "all," it just says that "This clade, named Podiata, had already been proposed on the shared capability to produce pseudopodia." Some groups still do not form pseudopodia, but it seems like that's an ancestral feature, i.e. a synapomorph. I think removing "All studied" would be better, as it is simply not true. Mentioning it like the source does is better in my opinion. Jako96 (talk) 10:40, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
