Talk:Picana

Argentina Low‑importance

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Picana, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of crime and criminal biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I am thinking of editing this page to clarify. The problem is that there is not a great deal of factual information available - for the obvious reason that users of the devices didn't go into print and the victims don't know the technical details or don't want to write about them.

As I understand it, the picana is/was a high voltage / low current device which (like the cattle prod or the modern stun baton or Taser) has two electrodes, meaning that no ground wire was necessary.

This may seem merely a technical distinction, but the point of a high voltage device is to provide a shock over a short distance at very low current and so avoid the danger of running a current through the vital organs. The combination of a single electrode with a ground wire was a lower voltage device with a variable resistor (to allow adjustment from zero to mains 110/220 volts) - which caused a higher current.

This made the high voltage picana allegedly a 'safer' device that was believed to allow repeated debilitating shocks with less risk of death.

If the above is right (which I believe it is), the picana was more technically sophisticated, whereas the mains voltages devices were cruder.

See Electricty: the global history of a torture technolgy

Does anyone have any more knowledge about this? If not, I am inclined to edit to follow Darius Rejali rather than the present version of the article.

Charlotte274 19:02, 18 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

New link for Rejali paper: "Electricity: The Global History Of A Torture Technology" Jimw338 (talk) 17:24, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Technical details correct?

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As far as I know, the picana was not similar to a cattle prod or stun baton; it had two electrodes, one of them (the "hot wire" that was moved around) was shaped like a knitting needle (see: http://irct.net.dynamicweb.dk/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx?File=Files%2FFiler%2FTortureJournal%2F16_2_2006%2F4_dermatological_findings.pdf for a description). Other sources claim that the picana was in fact a simple cattle prod, but I'm not aware of cattle prods with rheostats, and the pdf-file above comes from a reputable medical source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.83.206.206 (talk) 11:29, 25 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Untitled

Technical details correct?