Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Periyar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 16 days ago by Enigmaaa777333 in topic Split with annandurai para
Former good articlePeriyar was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 29, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
February 2, 2009Good article nomineeListed
December 20, 2012Good article reassessmentKept
February 18, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 17, 2023, and September 17, 2024.
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:58, 18 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

The article contains uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. The "Controversies" section has several problems: Its inclusion in the article may go against WP:POV, as the article is stating that these are controversies in wikivoice. The first part is mostly quotes, creating copyright concerns, the award controversy doesn't seem to be about him. I think this can either be removed or the information redistributed throughout the article. I think the "Comparisons with Gandhi" section is unnecessary in the article: why is Periyar being compared to this particular historical figure? This section also seems to be trying to elevate Preiyar's standing by comparing him to a favourable figure, which I do not think is the role of Wikipedia. If they cooperated together, that can be mentioned in the biography, but it doesn't need its own section. Z1720 (talk) 23:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Semi-protected edit request on 18 January 2026

[edit]

Remove the duplicate "Annai E. V. R. Maniammai" in the list of spouses in Periyar's infobox, particularly the one that has a supposed marriage year of 1948. (Request withdrawn, Lekeviree (talk) 06:46, 18 January 2026 (UTC)) Lekeviree (talk) 06:36, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Closing withdrawn request. Day Creature (talk) 07:01, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Renaming of the Article

[edit]

The article should read E. V. Ramasamy as Periyar is a title given by his followers. By following a neutral POV, one must use the legal name and not a follower given title. "Periyar" means the Elder One, which is merely a title and not a name. TechyLox (talk) 19:13, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 27 May 2026

[edit]

Arun Dhamotharan (talk) 09:54, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Not done. Wikipedia is written by human beings (you're also going to want to discuss this first for a consensus anyway). Deacon Vorbis (carbon  videos) 14:33, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Possible AI use

[edit]

Concerns were raised previously via tag about AI-generated content in part of this article, which is prohibited per WP:NOLLM. This is a procedural talk page section to discuss it. There is no need to ping me in response. Read WP:AISIGNS for more information for why this is tagged; however, note that fixing the issue requires more than just changing the superficial signs.

Rationale: 2025 edits here and here; notice WP:AISIGNS in undue emphasis on broader trends, vocab distro typical of 2025 LLM text, here and in user's other edits Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:59, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Joined justice party in 1938 not 1925

[edit]

Joined justice party in 1938 not 1925 Enigmaaa777333 (talk) 01:37, 18 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Split with annandurai para

[edit]

Periyar married maniammai in 1949nnot 1948 Enigmaaa777333 (talk) 02:24, 18 July 2026 (UTC)Reply