Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Paw

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Claykid155 in topic Rabbit foot image

Human paw

[edit]

Is there any sort of semi-authoritative definition of a paw? The current definition, "the soft foot of a mammal", would seem to include, say, human and mouse feet, neither of which are generally called "paws". Is this just an artifact of English usage, or do biologists recognize a concept of "paw" with some sort of narrower definition? --Delirium 20:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

AIUI the human foot is technically a paw, though we tend to call it foot to differentiate. Huamsn tend to like to deny our animal physicality, which may be one reason why our fur is called hair, our paws feet, & so on. Tabby (talk) 00:03, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

No actually, our hair is called hair because it is hair and not fur, which would cover a large part of the body. Our feet are actually called feet because of their anatomy, which is that of feet, as opposed to that of paws. --84.119.42.103 (talk) 22:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Six digits?

[edit]

I can only count five digits on the tiger's paw, if you include the back one. Is this a mistake, or have I misunderstood?--Jcvamp 04:21, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

I doubt that the rear pad should be considered a digit any more than the human heal would be considered a digit. Some mammals, dogs, etc, do have additional dewclaws, but I don't see them here. --Bcsr4ever 04:34, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well, if there were five including the rear pad (I don't know much about cat anatomy, so I was unsure whether it was equivalent to our thumb) and the rear pad isn't a digit, that leaves four, which still isn't six like the picture said. People seem to pick up on the irrelevant parts of my arguments... Anyway, it's been removed.--Jcvamp 15:48, 18 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 30 September 2019

[edit]

Change "The paw consists of the large, heart-shaped metacarpal or palmar pad (forelimb) or metatarsal or plantar pad (rear limb), and generally four load-bearing digital pads, although there can be five or six toes in the case of domestic cats and bears (including giant panda)." to "The paw consists of the large, heart-shaped metacarpal or palmar pad (forelimb) or metatarsal or plantar pad (rear limb), and generally four load-bearing digital pads, although there can be five or six toes in the case of domestic cats and bears (including giant panda). No mammal has less than five toes on the back feet except for cats, dogs, rabbits, etc." "No mammal has less than four toes on the back feet except for Canidae, Felidae, rabbits and certain rodents." 152.26.177.32 (talk) 00:56, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

 Not done. It's not clear what changes you want to make. Please make a precise request and provide reliable sources to verify any claims. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 04:08, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Do Not Ignore

[edit]

No mammal has less than five toes on the back feet, right?152.26.177.32 (talk) 00:57, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Is there a technical term for animals with paws, opposed to animals with hooves?

[edit]

It would be useful to include a technical terms, if there is one, that includes all animals with paws. This would be similar to the broad grouping of animals in the category ungulate. Does such a term exist? Pete unseth (talk) 16:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 30 January 2026

[edit]

Please share that paw pads are colloquially known as 'toe beans'. ~2026-66412-2 (talk) 17:43, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want made. Day Creature (talk) 20:43, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Rabbit foot image

[edit]

Could we possibly use a different image for the rabbit's paw that clearly displays its lack of pads? Using an image of a rabbit's foot talisman (with its underside not visible, might I add) doesn't really make sense to me in this context. Lagomorphs are distinct in that they don't have paw pads unlike other pawed animals. Having a visual example (that is actually attached to the animal's body) would be nice. Claykid155 (talk) 15:59, 27 August 2026 (UTC)Reply