Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Pauldron

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Darkball321 in topic Insufficient Photos

Protection provided

[edit]

It covers the armpit...and what else?--Joel 17:00, 10 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

The upper arm and shoulder. --Eyrian 23:21, 19 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image

[edit]

I'm almost certain the old image isn't actually a pauldron. The source doesn't specify, and it really looks like a couter with attached splinted vambrace to me. I've never seen a pauldron with wings shaped like that. I removed the image until someone claims otherwise. --Eyrian 23:21, 19 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for correcting that. It was the only public domain image I could find. I mistakenly identified it as a pauldron with a half-gorget and armpit smallshield variant, and I also thought it was a pauldron because the original image name said it was. --Berens 15:02, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Historical terminology

[edit]

A thread on MyArmoury.com (not a reliable source, so don't add it) suggests that the semantic distinction between "pauldron" and "spaulder" is unfounded, with "spaulder" being perhaps a misspelling for "spaudler". The two words have the same etymology: OED lists "spaudeler" in an entry last updated in 1913, and says it derives from Old French espalde meaning "spauld", the shoulder of a food animal, while "pauldron" is aphetic from espauleron meaning "shoulder plate", with an epenthetic -d-. The only citation for "spaudeler" is from 1884, "pauldron" from 1594 with older variants to 1396. Hairy Dude (talk) 14:58, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Insufficient Photos

[edit]

I think perhaps there should be an additional historical reference photo in this article. In addition, I think Sauron from Lord of the Rings inclusion as 1 of 2 photos is hilarious, but probably not up to Wikipedia's standards. Darkball321 (talk) 20:54, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply