Talk:Parineeti Chopra/GA1

==GA Review==

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pks1142 (talk · contribs) 13:58, 11 December 2012 (UTC) Refrences looks like no work has been done on them.Pks1142 (talk) 13:58, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Outside reviewer comment: This looks like too much work is needed on the references as well as the content too. I would recommend a quick-fail at present. She has an upcoming movie so more information will be easily added. I would say that the article would become tad unstable also. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 14:47, 11 December 2012 (UTC

• • I support a quick fail. The article has far too many issues. --smarojit ^{(buzz me)} 04:26, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
• Comment: I also agree with two users above. The article fails GA in the first sight. Torreslfchero (talk) 12:29, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
• Quick fail needed. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 16:46, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
• Fail Based on sort of "consensus" among the users above, I am failing the GA nomination. However, I feel the article definitely has potential. Text on her actions outside acting, media image etc would be nice addition. If these information are not available, that need to be mentioned. The lead looks quite short (of course, the article is not large, so that may be a reason of short lead). I did not go over the references, but other users (above) noted discrepancies. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 22:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)