Talk:Paridhi
Add topicLatest comment: 3 years ago by Bhagya sri113 in topic Apparent repetition to be checked
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Paridhi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Apparent repetition to be checked
[edit]@User:Bhagya_sri113. G. P. Chellammal's claim that Paridhi employs storytelling and Sundaramurthi's claim of using folklore essentially mean the same here , as far as I can see. However, I don't have the Sundaramurthi source. I don't see any other source (including Chellammal's) claiming about couplet 320 either. Can you please check again? At best, these can be merged if the couplet number isn't wrong. Rasnaboy (talk) 15:48, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, the couplet number is correct. Will merge as suggested. Bhagya sri113 (talk) 15:49, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class India articles
- Mid-importance India articles
- C-Class India articles of Mid-importance
- C-Class Tamil Nadu articles
- Mid-importance Tamil Nadu articles
- C-Class Tamil Nadu articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Tamil Nadu articles
- C-Class Indian history articles
- Low-importance Indian history articles
- C-Class Indian history articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Indian history articles
- C-Class Indian literature articles
- Mid-importance Indian literature articles
- C-Class Indian literature articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Indian literature articles
- C-Class Classical Tamil articles
- Low-importance Classical Tamil articles
- C-Class Classical Tamil articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject India articles