Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Panitya

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Bunnypranav in topic Requested move 27 October 2025

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Adelaide Lead, Victoria which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. RMCD bot 01:45, 2 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 27 October 2025

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:54, 16 November 2025 (UTC)Reply


– These appear to be the only places with this names, which would make them the WP:PTOPIC. Disambiguation is not required per WP:NCAUS. Therefore per WP:CONCISE we should lose the disambiguation. Any places with similar names can be dealt with by hatnotes or disamb pages per WP:SMALLDETAILS. TarnishedPathtalk 11:03, 27 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Note: WikiProject Australian places and WikiProject Victoria have been notified of this discussion. TarnishedPathtalk 03:22, 29 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Support - This appears quite straightforward and reasonable. CitadelRelay (talk) 07:48, 31 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Contesting that this is reasonable - see the outcome of an RFC on this matter. This RM seems to disregard the closing comments entirely. Dfadden (talk) 20:04, 3 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
The RFC closed as nil outcome. NCAUST states the proposed moves may occur and there is policy reason for them to occur. If you are going to contest bring policy arguments. TarnishedPathtalk 23:26, 3 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Oppose and request Speedy Close on the grounds that the RFC was closed with No Consensus, and noting the closer's remarks that most editors opposed dropping the state/territory from Australian place names in article titles and The default titling convention of "City, State/Territory" remains unchanged. Dfadden (talk) 20:05, 3 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
The result of the RFC has zero bearing on this discussion as it was a no consensus outcome, meaning that WP:NCAUS is in place unaltered. There is exactly zero grounds for a speedy close of this. TarnishedPathtalk 23:25, 3 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Support as per rationale, and following similar changes in Sydney :) gompk 15:26, 9 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.