Talk:Panitya
Add topic| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| On 27 October 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved from Panitya, Victoria to Panitya. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Adelaide Lead, Victoria which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:45, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Requested move 27 October 2025
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:54, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
- Panitya, Victoria → Panitya
- Panton Hill, Victoria → Panton Hill
- Parkers Corner, Victoria → Parkers Corner
- Pimpinio, Victoria → Pimpinio
- Pirlta, Victoria → Pirlta
- Pirron Yallock, Victoria → Pirron Yallock
- Point Leo, Victoria → Point Leo
- Pomonal, Victoria → Pomonal
- Poowong, Victoria → Poowong
- Port Franklin, Victoria → Port Franklin
- Port Welshpool, Victoria → Port Welshpool
- Powelltown, Victoria → Powelltown
- Red Hill South, Victoria → Red Hill South
- Ripplebrook, Victoria → Ripplebrook
- Rokewood Junction, Victoria → Rokewood Junction
- Rokewood, Victoria → Rokewood
- Rosewhite, Victoria → Rosewhite
- Rythdale, Victoria → Rythdale
- Sailors Falls, Victoria → Sailors Falls
- Scotchmans Lead, Victoria → Scotchmans Lead
- Serviceton, Victoria → Serviceton
- She Oaks, Victoria → She Oaks
- Skenes Creek, Victoria → Skenes Creek
- Smiths Gully, Victoria → Smiths Gully
- Staughton Vale, Victoria → Staughton Vale
- Strath Creek, Victoria → Strath Creek
- Strathewen, Victoria → Strathewen
- Suggan Buggan, Victoria → Suggan Buggan
- Sunnycliffs, Victoria → Sunnycliffs
- Sutherlands Creek, Victoria → Sutherlands Creek
– These appear to be the only places with this names, which would make them the WP:PTOPIC. Disambiguation is not required per WP:NCAUS. Therefore per WP:CONCISE we should lose the disambiguation. Any places with similar names can be dealt with by hatnotes or disamb pages per WP:SMALLDETAILS. TarnishedPathtalk 11:03, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Australian places and WikiProject Victoria have been notified of this discussion. TarnishedPathtalk 03:22, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support - This appears quite straightforward and reasonable. CitadelRelay (talk) 07:48, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- Contesting that this is reasonable - see the outcome of an RFC on this matter. This RM seems to disregard the closing comments entirely. Dfadden (talk) 20:04, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- The RFC closed as nil outcome. NCAUST states the proposed moves may occur and there is policy reason for them to occur. If you are going to contest bring policy arguments. TarnishedPathtalk 23:26, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- Contesting that this is reasonable - see the outcome of an RFC on this matter. This RM seems to disregard the closing comments entirely. Dfadden (talk) 20:04, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose and request Speedy Close on the grounds that the RFC was closed with No Consensus, and noting the closer's remarks that
most editors opposed dropping the state/territory from Australian place names in article titles
andThe default titling convention of "City, State/Territory" remains unchanged.
Dfadden (talk) 20:05, 3 November 2025 (UTC)- The result of the RFC has zero bearing on this discussion as it was a no consensus outcome, meaning that WP:NCAUS is in place unaltered. There is exactly zero grounds for a speedy close of this. TarnishedPathtalk 23:25, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- Support per nominator's rationale. Benratta (talk) 23:21, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- Support per previous discussions similar to this one. Thanks, 1isall (he/him) (talk | contribs) 13:55, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Support as per rationale, and following similar changes in Sydney :) gompk 15:26, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose As with American municipalities, almost all use the state they are in, and that would make consistent sense here. The other links can redirect. ← Metallurgist (talk) 21:53, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- Again, these are Australian places, not American ones. Thanks, 1isall (he/him) (talk | contribs) 22:01, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- Adding to 1isall, the appropriate naming convention is WP:NCAUS which allows the proposals. When adding in WP:CONCISE there is an argument for movement. TarnishedPathtalk 00:16, 12 November 2025 (UTC)



