Talk:Pancholi
Add topic| This article was nominated for deletion on 2 June 2025. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related to caste-related topics in South Asia, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. The entire article relates to the following contentious topics:
The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
Pancholi Surname Actually belongs to Brahmin Clan
[edit]There are so many misinformation about this surname. It actually belongs to Brahmin Samaaj. Chetanh2o (talk) 16:16, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
- I request that the article be amended to note that the surname Pancholi is also historically documented among Brahmins in Gujarat.
- A Government of India publication records a manuscript of the Māṇḍūkī Śikṣā as having been obtained from a "Pancholi Brahmin from Gujarat":
- This would not remove the existing information about Ahir Pancholis; rather, it would clarify that the surname is also documented in a Brahmin context. Chetanh2o (talk) 03:09, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want made. The URL is missing from your request. Umby 🌕🐶 (talk) 03:21, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you. The source URL is:
- https://namami.gov.in/sites/default/files/book_pdf/Samiksika%20Series%2011.pdf
- The relevant passage is in the section "MĀṆḌŪKĪ ŚIKṢĀ" by Bhagyalata Pataskar. It states that the manuscript of the Māṇḍūkī Śikṣā was first available from "a Pancholi Brahmin from Gujarat."
- I request that the edit request be reactivated for review. Chetanh2o (talk) 03:25, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Not done: your request appears to have been generated by a large language model. Alpha Beta Delta Lambda (talk) 10:49, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Edit request 28 August 2026
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: Please remove the uncited migration narrative in the first paragraph. The claims about migration from Gokul/Vrindavan to Dwarka with Krishna and subsequent migration into Saurashtra have no inline citation and are historical/religious claims requiring reliable sourcing under WP:V and WP:BURDEN.
Diff:
| − | The Ahir Pancholi are clan of the Ahir caste found in the state of Gujarat, India | + | The Ahir Pancholi are clan of the Ahir caste found in the state of Gujarat, India. |
Edit request 28 August 2026
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change:
"According to the Archaeology Survey of India"
to:
"According to the Anthropological Survey of India"
The cited work is K. S. Singh (ed.), People of India: Gujarat, Vol. XXII, published by the Anthropological Survey of India / Popular Prakashan. The current wording incorrectly attributes the source to the Archaeological Survey of India.
