Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:OutThere

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Piotrus in topic Awards notability

No CoI

[edit]

Editor/writer has no affiliation whatsoever with the topics or persons connected with Out There magazine. I have an interest in UK magazine publishing and noted this topic was missing The Cleaning Laddy (talk) 09:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

The image is photographed by me, with copies of OutThere I own The Cleaning Laddy (talk) 22:57, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Image used

[edit]

I originally uploaded an image to accompany this article that I had photographed myself, but I learnt; big thanks to User:GeneralNotability that it didn’t comply with Wikipedia Commons Derivative works guidelines. As per their suggestion, I made a request to the magazine’s publisher to upload a cover image that I can use. They responded quickly and have done so, and have said that they will email via the OTRS to confirm free usage. I have updated the image.

Please note that, apart from our very recent exchange, I do not have any relationship, paid or otherwise with Out There magazine.

The Cleaning Laddy (talk) 23:58, 30 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Awards notability

[edit]

It was suggested in the AfD discussion for this article that I expand on the awards section to establish notability, the full and lengthy discussion is on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/OutThere_(magazine). The awards are notable on further investigation, but on first glance may not appear so, hence the embellishments in the section. However, I appreciate that it now may lean towards sounding promotional/ad, which is not my intention, but I'm looking for a happy balance. Perhaps Piotrus, or any other more experienced editor could help me out here? Thanks in advance The Cleaning Laddy (talk) 13:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

I think the current section is fine; I don't detect any editorializing. The article would benefit from expansion in other areas (sections), but given the relatively little history of the magazine, it may simply not be possible yet. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply