Talk:Oracle RAC

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

I believe that in addition to the list of "Oracle's competitors" offering a shared nothing architecture include Teradata, at least according to Wikipedia. (I don't have another source to verify this.) --Michael 20:03, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

   Added Teradata, IBM DB2 BCU and Netezza for products of true MPP/SN architecture.

Removed those entries that are SMP clustered.

In the "Competitors" section

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

   "Oracle RAC is not the only commercially available database that offers a shared-everything architecture."

Maybe I'm confused, but is this supposed to read shared-nothing? Null Nihils 09:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I believe you are confused. Many vendors have shared-nothing architectures, but I don't believe many have shared-everything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.152.49.106 (talk) 16:48, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Does it access the same or different data files and control files? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.135.50.211 (talk) 04:14, 20 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

In the "Competitors" section