Talk:Operation Pathways
Add topicLatest comment: 6 years ago by Harrias in topic GA Review
 | Operation Pathways was nominated as a Warfare good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 13, 2019). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Operation Pathways article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Pacific Pathways/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Harrias (talk · contribs) 12:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
I'll pick this up shortly. Harrias talk 12:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately, as a list, this article is not eligible for Good article status; see Wikipedia:Good article criteria#What cannot be a good article?. The more appropriate venue would be WP:Featured lists, although be aware that in its current state, this list currently would not meet the necessary criteria. Please consider a listing at WP:Peer review. Harrias talk 11:52, 13 September 2019 (UTC)