Talk:Operation Corporate
Add topicLatest comment: 14 years ago by Mztourist in topic Merge
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
.svg){kind=small}
Untitled
[edit]Is this page necessary except as a redirect to the F war page? 207.189.98.44 20:41, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Maybe not, I like military codewords and so tend to post pages on those lines. Perhaps this page is more a of a military history of that war. I see no harm in keeping it. Paul, in Saudi
It is necessary. Operation Corporate is not the same as the entire war, in the same way that Operation Rosario is not representative of the entire war. David Newton 13:31, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Bit too one-sided piece. It's certainly not over-the-top, but I think it crosses the line a tad. Needs to be more objective -- less pro-Brit.
- Pazouzou 09:32, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- How the hell is it 'pro-Brit'? Douglasnicol 23:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Merge
[edit]Get rid of this unnecessary stub. Mztourist (talk) 09:12, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- Redirect-Class military history pages
- Redirect-Class British military history pages
- British military history task force articles
- Redirect-Class European military history pages
- European military history task force articles
- Redirect-Class South America pages
- NA-importance South America pages
- Redirect-Class Falkland Islands pages
- NA-importance Falkland Islands pages
- Falkland Islands articles
- WikiProject South America articles