Talk:Operation Clipper

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Operation Clipper article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European / German / North America / United States / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

THe war was over in May '45. Why did they attack in November '45? Let me change it. Paul, in Saudi 14:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

British sources?

Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The source for the detail comes from a US source. Not unreasonably, it focusses on the US effort and only mentions XXX Corps in asides. Anyone know of a British source that can add detail of the British side of the attack? Folks at 137 11:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Not stub

Latest comment: 19 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Removed stub tag to prompt a review. Folks at 137 08:05, 6 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

A nice article, all things considered: it covers the subject in a wealth of detail. A few remarks though:

It needs footnotes, so that every fact can be attributed to a particular source
It lacks illustrations: a photo or two would be good, and a map even better
The Attack section is a bit long and should probably be broken down into subsections, if possible.

Regards.Raoulduke47 12:26, 23 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

British sources?

Not stub