Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Online shaming

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

EXAMPLE FARM

[edit]

This article contains too many examples. As per WP:EXAMPLEFARM. I think we should cull them down to half a dozen prominent examples, at most. Bacondrum (talk) 03:09, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

I agree. I'm proposing removing at minimum any that don't have their own article or involve people who already were notable. Anyone who isn't notable is silly to include when we have multiple examples that explain the issue, which is the point of giving examples. We don't need a comprehensive list of every incident of internet shaming that ever was mentioned in the media. valereee (talk) 15:45, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
I've done so. There are still probably more than we need, so let's discuss before adding anything back. valereee (talk) 16:36, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
The Justine Sacco incident is linked from elsewhere on wikipedia. Here, for instance. 92.236.132.236 (talk) 11:48, 4 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, I've removed that broken link. Valereee (talk) 12:26, 4 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
I added sources to the "Negative reviews" section, as well as references. Not examples, just references for the examples in the article. Maher Chas (talk) 20:10, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Oh yes, absolutely. One should ask: does example X adds anything to understand better the subject? Or perhaps the example was misleading? Right now almost every scandal includes multiple people commenting online. Does it mean it belongs here? At the very least, we must follow sources. Do we have RS saying that an example X was "online shaming" or it was indeed an obvious online shaming campaign. And even if an example was included, it should focus on the subject, i.e. online shaming, rather than debating at length if someone was a good or a bad person. My very best wishes (talk) 21:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Mary Bale" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Mary Bale has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 24 § Mary Bale until a consensus is reached. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 16:23, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Call outs?

[edit]

Please explain. This article is too USA-biased. ~2025-32370-46 (talk) 23:29, 9 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: DMD 3010w Critical Perspectives on Digital Media

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2025 and 5 December 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tigerseye333 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Tigerseye333 (talk) 17:31, 14 November 2025 (UTC)Reply