Talk:Onekotan

Volcanoes Low‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: Physical geography Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the physical geography of Russia task force.

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands

Question

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Was this island ever part of Japan? (And while I am asking questions, how was it garrisoned during the War?) Paul, in Saudi (talk) 00:26, 29 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possible AI-generated content

Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi -- I have tagged the section added by User:Vallee as potentially LLM-generated. The diff, and a great deal of their other contributions, displays several AI writing tells and their userpage is a giveaway they use AI for at least some things. I have not removed the content as this is just a suspicion, but it needs fact checking, and then a rewrite for non-neutral tone (in that order). Gnomingstuff (talk) 14:46, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

I was offline for some time.

Yes, indeed, I used AI for translations, proofing, and for wiki-formatting.

However, I did it on the basis of serious scientific articles (mostly sciencedirect, JSTOR, or books), which I always referenced correctly. Before hitting the post button, I always checked if the data is accurate.

It was in a phase during which I made a lot of QGIS maps, and was frustrated by the emptyness of the corresponding pages, which I wanted to populate with accurate, retracable information.

I hope this explains the approach.

Till Vallee (talk) 10:48, 21 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Question

Possible AI-generated content