Talk:OmniScriptum

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2012; 2013; 2014; 2015; 2019; 2022;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Moldova Low‑importance

	Moldova portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Moldova, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Moldova on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoldovaWikipedia:WikiProject MoldovaTemplate:WikiProject MoldovaMoldova
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests: Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess: Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit: Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox: Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain: Portal:Companies
Stubs: Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other:
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 4 April 2010, OmniScriptum and its talk page were linked from Slashdot, a high-traffic website. (Traffic)

All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

VarisGrin (talk · contribs) has been paid by OmniScriptum on their behalf.

Imprint section

Latest comment: 9 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

is it not excessive to have this table of their relatively non-notable imprints with weak sourcing? im in favor of removal or at least trimming/reformatting Sr1jj (talk) 14:52, 7 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

It's excessive to have anything remain in any article if it's without adequate sourcing or at least a warning to readers that the material is sourced poorly, if at all. That aside, no, it's not excessive. I'm amazed at the amount of material stripped in the space of two months late this year from this July '25 version (of Materialscientist's). For example, July's

OmniScriptum is designated as non-academic by the Norwegian Scientific Index,^[1] and its subsidiary Lambert Academic Publishing has been described as a predatory vanity press which does "not apply the basic standards of academic publishing such as peer-review, editorial or proof-reading processes."^[2]

has become

OmniScriptum is listed as non-academic by the Norwegian Scientific Index,^[3]^[4]

whereas it could instead be something like

Both Omniscriptum (as Verlag Dr. Müller) and its subsidiary Lambert Academic Publishing are designated as failing to qualify as academic by the Norwegian Scientific Index.^[5]^[6]^[a] Lambert Academic Publishing has also been described as the "most dominating" among "predatory publishers that seek out authors of new theses", a vanity press which does "not apply the basic standards of academic publishing such as peer-review, editorial or proof-reading processes".^[10]

Notes

↑ This is seen from their Nivå ('Level')^[7] of 0, year after year. By contrast, Elsevier qualifies ("1");^[8] Cambridge University Press qualifies with distinction ("2").^[9]

References

↑ "Publiseringskanaler". Norsk senter for forskningsdata.
↑ "Your Thesis and the Predatory Publisher". Bond University Library. 13 March 2013. Retrieved 31 October 2019.
↑ "Publiseringskanaler". Norsk senter for forskningsdata.
↑ "Your Thesis and the Predatory Publisher". Bond University Library. 13 March 2013. Retrieved 31 October 2019.
↑ "Publiseringskanaler: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG" (in Norwegian). HK Direktoratet for høyere utdanning og kompetansu. Retrieved 20 December 2025.
↑ "Publiseringskanaler: Lambert Academic Publishing" (in Norwegian). HK Direktoratet for høyere utdanning og kompetansu. Retrieved 20 December 2025.
↑ "Nivåer og nivåendringer" (in Norwegian). HK Direktoratet for høyere utdanning og kompetansu. Retrieved 20 December 2025.
↑ "Publiseringskanaler: Elsevier" (in Norwegian). HK Direktoratet for høyere utdanning og kompetansu. Retrieved 20 December 2025.
↑ "Publiseringskanaler: Cambridge University Press" (in Norwegian). HK Direktoratet for høyere utdanning og kompetansu. Retrieved 20 December 2025.
↑ "Your Thesis and the Predatory Publisher". Bond University Library. 13 March 2015. Archived from the original on 15 March 2022.

-- Hoary (talk) 05:59, 20 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Pinging Sr1jj, -- Hoary (talk) 11:38, 20 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

[10] This is seen from their Nivå ('Level')^[7] of 0, year after year. By contrast, Elsevier qualifies ("1");^[8] Cambridge University Press qualifies with distinction ("2").^[9]

[1] "Publiseringskanaler". Norsk senter for forskningsdata.

[bond-2] "Your Thesis and the Predatory Publisher". Bond University Library. 13 March 2013. Retrieved 31 October 2019.

[3] "Publiseringskanaler". Norsk senter for forskningsdata.

[4] "Your Thesis and the Predatory Publisher". Bond University Library. 13 March 2013. Retrieved 31 October 2019.

[5] "Publiseringskanaler: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG" (in Norwegian). HK Direktoratet for høyere utdanning og kompetansu. Retrieved 20 December 2025.

[6] "Publiseringskanaler: Lambert Academic Publishing" (in Norwegian). HK Direktoratet for høyere utdanning og kompetansu. Retrieved 20 December 2025.

[7] "Nivåer og nivåendringer" (in Norwegian). HK Direktoratet for høyere utdanning og kompetansu. Retrieved 20 December 2025.

[8] "Publiseringskanaler: Elsevier" (in Norwegian). HK Direktoratet for høyere utdanning og kompetansu. Retrieved 20 December 2025.

[9] "Publiseringskanaler: Cambridge University Press" (in Norwegian). HK Direktoratet for høyere utdanning og kompetansu. Retrieved 20 December 2025.

[11] "Your Thesis and the Predatory Publisher". Bond University Library. 13 March 2015. Archived from the original on 15 March 2022.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[a]

[10]

[7]

[8]

[9]

Archives (Index)
2012 2013 2014 2015 2019 2022
This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Imprint section