Talk:Olipop

Clarification needed

I understand that we're simply reporting what the source says here, but I think this could use some clarification as to how a company that produces a food product has an "all-remote work force". For a horrifying minute, I imagined that employees were producing and bottling the product in their kitchens at home, but the cited article states immediately afterward that the product is produced in a laboratory. Surely there must be employees who work in the laboratory to produce and bottle and ship the product? If you're telling me this start-up has built a fully-automated laboratory that produces millions of dollars worth of product with no humans on-site, that's as big if not a bigger story than the healthy soda! 97.102.30.205 (talk) 16:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by NotAGenious talk 12:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that a company's workforce, with over $100 million in revenue, is all remote? Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/16/how-olipops-founders-turned-100k-investment-into-healthier-soda-brand.html
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/19.99

Created by Panamitsu (talk). Self-nominated at 00:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Olipop; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• Not a review: Wouldn't the current phrasing imply the workforce has over $100 million in revenue as opposed to the company? Bremps... 04:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Oh yes it does. How about ALT1 : "...that a company, with over $100 million in revenue, has an all remote workforce?"
• I don't see a compelling reason to pipe the company's name in this DYK, but up to those more involved than me :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 02:30, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Oh yes I don't either, ALT2:

  "...that Olipop, with over $100 million in revenue, has an all-remote workforce?"

  —Panamitsu (talk) 03:02, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

@Panamitsu: Please provide a QPQ, or this nomination is liable to be closed as unsuccessful. Z1720 (talk) 03:51, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Oh, Z1720, I'm not sure how I forgot about that. QPQ is done now. —Panamitsu (talk) 04:14, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

• Full review needed now that QPQ has been providing; striking original hook and ALT1 per objection above. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:46, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
  • @Panamitsu: New enough and barely long enough. QPQ present. Big issue right now are the multiple {{cn}} tags that must be addressed before this goes to the Main Page. I am also hesitant about this entire article resting on two sources. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:12, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

• @Panamitsu: Have the above been resolved? Z1720 (talk) 03:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

• Yes, all issues appear to be resolved. Citation needed tags have been fixed, and there are currently eight sources. —Panamitsu (talk) 07:33, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

• • • • • Good to go. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC)