Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Besides really bad acting whereby camgirls have faked epileptic fits wobbling around like a comedy skit is this device really notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia? I mean, maybe the grand mal / acting epidepic flooding across cam sites and doing the rounds on comedy websites where cam caps of these Eastern European professional camsluts jiggling and flopping about has been turned into compilations to laugh at maybe, MAYBE that would be notable. But given numerous people have shown that the device is underpowered, unresponsive and pretty much rubbish (to debunk the wobblers on cam sites that is, not neccessarily to thrash and debunk the product like it inadvertently did) it of it's own accord isn't notable. 121.211.33.244 (talk) 03:47, 4 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}