Talk:Northern Command (Israel)
Add topic
 | You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
| Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the Arab–Israeli conflict.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
Inclusion of "gaza genocide" in infobox
[edit]I've noticed another editor (and other editors before recently) contesting the inclusion of the term in the infobox. It should not be included in the infobox alongside actual wars and engagements fought by the Northern Command in particular. If you would like "gaza genocide" in this article, discuss it with other editors, make a page for allegations against the Northern Command, or put those allegations in a section of this article. Similar articles that are protected for this reason do not include accusations of genocide in the engagements list, and this article has no reason to break from that. R810 (talk) 22:19, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- I have no opinion on this, but it should be discussed on this talk page rather than edit warring. Prezbo (talk) 01:50, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
- There's nothing I can do if the person making the disruptive edits refused to talk, and has replied to his only known disagreement with dismissive emojis months ago, and an administrator locks it with the partisan editor's edit maintained. R810 (talk) 22:40, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Protection has also been filed after someone made two disruptive edits, one of which you had to revert and the other which is the current version. R810 (talk) 22:43, 16 May 2025 (UTC)