Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
Agender was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 18 November 2014 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists.
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
This article was created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride, 2015, 2016 and 2017.Wiki Loves PrideWikipedia:Wiki Loves PrideTemplate:Wiki Loves Pride talkWiki Loves Pride
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them.
Other articles have been merged into this article.
The content of Neutrois was merged into Non-binary on 26 November 2014. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review prior discussions if you are considering renomination.
Latest comment: 25 days ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Enbian and diamoric are both terms used by nonbinary people to refer to their attraction (Enbian for nonbinary people attracted to other nonbinary people, and diamoric to refer to the lack of 'same-gender' or 'opposite-gender' attraction due to being nonbinary. The terms are notable enough to already be within an article (linked), but aren't mentioned here; perhaps we could add them? If so, in which section? I considered the Identities section, but that primarily refers to different nonbinary gender identities, so probably Terms and definitions? I'm a bit of an amateur editor, so I wanted to reach some consensus first. kitokat ✦ xe/it/any ✦ chat?08:14, 12 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Also, after taking a look at the way diamoric is defined in that article, it seems to use the broader definition; not to say we should change or remove it, but are there any usable sources supporting the definition I mentioned above? So that both can be mentioned, to clear up confusion. kitokat ✦ xe/it/any ✦ chat?08:17, 12 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Kitokat, pinging you since this post is old. You would need to find sources to support using a different definition either here or at LGBTQ slang. The LGBTQ slang definition is supported by three citations, so you would also need to find enough sourcing to show that your definition is reasonably common and well-documented relative to the current definition. If you want to discuss the definitions used there, the best place to do that would be a post at Talk:LGBTQ slang. For now, I have copied the current definitions into Non-binary §Terms and definitions. It seems appropriate to cover this, based on ample sourcing and obvious relevance to the topic. There is no section on dating or romance but the terminology section makes sense to me. —Myceteae🍄🟫 (talk) 20:00, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 24 days ago4 comments3 people in discussion
I am aware that there are oodles of subtypes, however, as a demiboyfluix myself, I find my gender not on this article, or any wikipedia article. Though it's true this isn't specifically a gender wiki, it's important that some of the lesser recognized genders be represented.
Thank you for your consideration. ~2026-37687-74 (talk) 18:43, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
The entries listed under Non-binary#Identities are restricted to those that are most common/most prominent in high quality reliable sources. Demiflux is defined under Non-binary#Demigender. We generally avoid adding less common terms as they are beyond the scope and purpose of a general audience encyclopedia. If there is good sourcing, this could be considered. We also must balance inclusion of each sub-gender or identity against other terms that may or may not be included and the relative prominence within the wider Non-binary topic. —Myceteae🍄🟫 (talk) 19:36, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Understood. Thank you for clarifying that for me! Do you know of other open-source dictionaries that might have that in it? (Sorry, I'm doing this from a different computer.) ~2026-37749-16 (talk) 18:17, 2 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
If you are looking for dictionaries or other high quality sources that might satisfy Wikipedia's standards of reliability, in order to include more terms in this article, I do not know any specific resources of the top of my head. I suspect that genders like demiboyfluix are just not that well documented in the kind of sources we typically rely on. The other editors at WP:LGBTQ+ may have more ideas. —Myceteae🍄🟫 (talk) 19:01, 2 July 2026 (UTC)Reply