Talk:Nintendo Switch/GA2

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: TzarN64 (talk · contribs) 15:43, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 17:25, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

I've accepted @TzarN64:'s request to review this article. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 17:26, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

This should be an auto fail, as the nominator is not a major contributor to the article. Freedooxm, I recommend slowing down on the reviews too, as they are pretty tough around the edges. They're not even in the top 200, and one of their few edits was immediately reverted for having obvious typos. Please get more experience first. Sergecross73 msg me 18:04, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Okay, Just quickfailed it. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 20:42, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.